Prediction of Cameron Norrie [88th] vs Jesper De Jong [94th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L L L W W L
Form
L W W W L W L W W LHead To Head: Norrie 0 - 0 Jong
| Norrie | Stats | Jong |
|---|---|---|
| 45% (9-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (13-11) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 88 | Ranking | 94 |
| 8 | Highest Rank | 94 |
| 29 | Age | 24 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 7 |
| 62% (383-238) | Career Total W/L | 63% (266-158) |
| $8,066,055 | Career Prize Money | $526,725 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cameron Norrie vs Jesper De Jong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Norrie 0 - 0 Jong
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Norrie has won 42.82% of points on their second serve, while Jong has won 46.38%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Norrie, in recent form, has won 46.59% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jong has won 42.98%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.41% and 23.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Norrie has saved 52.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jong has saved 55.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Norrie has won 46.81% of matches played (W/L 22/ 25), with Jong winning 63.64% (W/L 49/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Norrie has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 229/ 111), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 26/ 28). Jong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 87/ 43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Norrie has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 13/ 13), where as Jong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.58% of matches (W/L 31/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Norrie has played against opponents with an average rank of 147.64 while Jong has played against players with an average rank of 262.01.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Norrie has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jong has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Norrie has converted 30.61% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jong has converted 28.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Cameron Norrie vs Jesper De Jong Best Odds For The Match
Cameron Norrie Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Karen Khachanov
Player
Cameron Norrie
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
105)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
107
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cameron Norrie
Player
Damir Dzumhur
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cameron Norrie
Player
Hugo Gaston
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Cameron Norrie
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Cameron Norrie
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Constant Lestienne
Player
Cameron Norrie
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
34 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Cameron Norrie
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cameron Norrie
Player
Jiri Lehecka
60%
(
66 of
110)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
93)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cameron Norrie
Player
Luca Nardi
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Cameron Norrie
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jesper De Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Jesper De Jong
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Lloyd Harris
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Elliot Benchetrit
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
5 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Jesper De Jong
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Sebastian Ofner
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Filip Misolic
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Titouan Droguet
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Jesper De Jong
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
3
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
41 of
51)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Norrie vs Jong?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Norrie Vs Jong is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (383/238) | Win/Loss | 63% (266/158) |
| 58% (895/645) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (586/383) |
| 53% (7829/6898) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (5014/4177) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
| 2599 | Aces Total | 1703 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1588 | Total Double Faults | 1079 |
| 1:36:11 | Average Match Time | 1:39:23 |
| 123.58 | Average Opponent Rank | 285.23 |
| 65% (27699/42823) | 1st Serve % | 60% (17194/28557) |
| 70% (19447/27699) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (12043/17194) |
| 50% (7611/15124) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5790/11363) |
| 43% (1764/4114) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1313/3067) |
| 39% (16845/43097) | Return Points Win % | 41% (11957/28817) |
| 62% (345/553) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (254/405) |
| 53% (34/64) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (4/7) |
| 50% (100/200) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (74/144) |
| 60% (125/207) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (65/124) |
| 86% (375/322) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (260/231) |
| 14% (375/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (260/29) |
| 24% (246/58) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (164/33) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
